New Terminal Emulator 'Shitty' Surpasses Competitors in Performance
A new terminal emulator, 'Shitty', has been released, boasting faster performance than established alternatives like Alacritty and Kitty. Built for low latency and fast startup, Shitty uses native compute backends and has been tested against over 5,000 benchmarks. However, its memory-unsafe design raises concerns.
Key points
- Shitty, a new terminal emulator, has been released with a focus on low latency and fast startup.
- It uses native compute backends, such as Vulkan and Metal, to achieve high performance.
- Shitty has been tested against over 5,000 benchmarks, surpassing Alacritty and Kitty in some cases.
- However, the emulator's memory-unsafe design may raise concerns for some users.
- The project's author emphasizes the importance of speed and predictability in terminal performance.
New Terminal Emulator 'Shitty' Surpasses Competitors in Performance
A new terminal emulator, 'Shitty', has been released, boasting faster performance than established alternatives like Alacritty and Kitty. Built for low latency and fast startup, Shitty uses native compute backends and has been tested against over 5,000 benchmarks.
Performance Comparison
Shitty's performance has been compared to other popular terminal emulators, including Alacritty and Kitty. In some cases, Shitty has surpassed its competitors in terms of speed.
Memory-Safe Design
However, Shitty's memory-unsafe design may raise concerns for some users. The project's author emphasizes the importance of speed and predictability in terminal performance, but acknowledges the potential risks associated with this approach.
Future Development
The future development of Shitty is uncertain, but the project's author has expressed a willingness to continue improving the emulator's performance and features.
Sources
The WireByte editorial team synthesises technology news from multiple primary sources, verifies the facts, and links every source. Articles are produced with AI assistance and reviewed under our editorial policy.