Apple Lawsuit: Jon Prosser Denies Conspiracy in iOS Leak Case
Jon Prosser, a YouTuber, has filed a response to Apple's lawsuit over allegedly stealing iOS secrets. Prosser denied a coordinated scheme, but admitted to recording unreleased iOS software and sharing revenue with the person who showed him the information. The case involves Prosser and another defendant, Michael Ramacciotti, accused of stealing trade secrets from an Apple employee. Apple's lawsuit claims they profited from the theft, but Prosser blames Ramacciotti for the alleged disclosure.
Key points
- Jon Prosser, a YouTuber, has filed a response to Apple's lawsuit over allegedly stealing iOS secrets.
- Prosser denied a coordinated scheme with Michael Ramacciotti, but admitted to recording unreleased iOS software and sharing revenue with Ramacciotti.
- The alleged leak involved iOS 19, which resembled Apple's Liquid Glass interface later demonstrated at WWDC as iOS 26.
- Prosser claims Ramacciotti is responsible for the alleged disclosure of trade secrets, not him.
- Apple's lawsuit claims Prosser and Ramacciotti profited from the theft of trade secrets from an Apple employee.
Apple Lawsuit: Jon Prosser Denies Conspiracy in iOS Leak Case
Jon Prosser, a YouTuber, has filed a response to Apple's lawsuit over allegedly stealing iOS secrets. In his response, Prosser denied a coordinated scheme with Michael Ramacciotti, but admitted to recording unreleased iOS software and sharing revenue with Ramacciotti.
The alleged leak involved iOS 19, which resembled Apple's Liquid Glass interface later demonstrated at WWDC as iOS 26. Prosser claims Ramacciotti is responsible for the alleged disclosure of trade secrets, not him.
Apple's lawsuit claims Prosser and Ramacciotti profited from the theft of trade secrets from an Apple employee. The case is ongoing, with no clear outcome yet.
Sources
The WireByte editorial team synthesises technology news from multiple primary sources, verifies the facts, and links every source. Articles are produced with AI assistance and reviewed under our editorial policy.