Home / Business & Economy

Photo of robotics warehouse, artificial intelligence, robot
Image: via cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net
Business & Economy

AI Spending Woes: Companies Struggle to Justify Investment

WireByte Staff · August 5, 2026

Uber's President and COO, Andrew Macdonald, revealed that the company spent its entire 2026 AI budget in four months, with 5,000 engineers relying on Anthropic's Claude Code. This trend reflects a broader issue, with 25% of planned AI spend deferred to 2027 due to CFO scrutiny over ROI. Experts warn that companies are using AI in the wrong way, echoing the Solow Paradox of the 1980s.

Key points

  • Uber spent its entire 2026 AI budget in four months, with 5,000 engineers relying on Anthropic's Claude Code.
  • 25% of planned AI spend is being deferred to 2027 due to CFO scrutiny over ROI, according to Forrester research.
  • Only 23% of companies have scaled AI agents in even a single business function, despite 62% experimenting with them, McKinsey's State of AI report found.
  • Experts attribute the struggle to justify AI investment to companies using it in the wrong way, echoing the Solow Paradox of the 1980s.
  • CEO at Nearform notes that companies need to fundamentally redesign their processes to realize AI's full potential.

The recent admission by Uber's President and COO, Andrew Macdonald, that the company's AI spending is becoming harder to justify is a symptom of a broader issue in the tech industry. The rapid expenditure of AI budgets, such as Uber's entire 2026 budget being spent in four months, highlights the struggle companies face in justifying the return on investment (ROI) for AI projects.

According to Forrester research, 25% of planned AI spend is being deferred to 2027 due to CFO scrutiny over ROI. This trend is not unique to Uber, as McKinsey's State of AI report found that only 23% of companies have scaled AI agents in even a single business function, despite 62% experimenting with them.

Experts attribute the struggle to justify AI investment to companies using it in the wrong way, echoing the Solow Paradox of the 1980s. Nobel laureate economist Robert Solow observed that computers were everywhere in innovative businesses, but the productivity numbers didn't move. Similarly, companies are using AI, but not fundamentally redesigning their processes to realize its full potential.

As CEO at Nearform notes, companies need to fundamentally redesign their processes to realize AI's full potential. This requires a shift from simply bolting AI onto existing processes to a more transformative approach that leverages AI to drive innovation and productivity gains.

Sources

WireByte Staff — Editorial Team

The WireByte editorial team synthesises technology news from multiple primary sources, verifies the facts, and links every source. Articles are produced with AI assistance and reviewed under our editorial policy.